by Michael Hammerschlag
Lately, I’ve been considering whether Bush’s fourth
justification for the Iraq War: we are fighting them there so they won’t
come here isn’t completely without merit. After all,
there have, incredibly, been no attacks in
America since 9-11. And creating a theme
park for jihadists in Iraq certainly has
kept them occupied. It was brought home to
me by a friend in Hawaii. “I believe that. Hey, I’m a lifelong Democrat.
But there haven’t been any attacks here.”
Again and again this is mentioned by US troops
as the rationale for their struggle and suffering,
and it seems logical.
But it breaks down on closer examination.
First, there’s the madness of creating a
vicious insurgent war in a place that didn’t
have one. No matter how many times Bush and
the neocons say so, there were no terrorists directed at America
in Iraq before the invasion*, until we invaded and created them. Perhaps
Iraq has functioned as a gigantic bug zapper
for jihadi mosquitoes- where were the suicide
bomber when Saddam reigned?- but most fanatics
are home grown. Was it really worth the immense
price in lives and treasure? The Arabs who
flocked to fight the good fight in Iraq weren’t
planning or able to mount attacks on America.
Maybe in Iraq, they will get the training
to do so: a prison university for criminals,
except it’s Al Qaida training terrorists.
There was a fierce fire in Afghanistan, but
lacking much fuel in population or fervor.
Special Forces and CIA brilliantly extinguished
the fire by routing the Taliban and their
Qaida colleagues in record time, but glowing
pockets persisted in hideouts. Rather than
keep spreading foam on the coals of Islamic
grievance and paranoia as we hunted OBL and
his minions, George Bush 2 found an immense
stand of old growth sequoias and redwoods
a thousand miles away and torched them, creating
a conflagration that seems to be growing
exponentially. The forest there was carpeted
by hundreds of years of kindling and deadwood
in the hatreds, oppressions, and murders
between religious, tribal, and ethnic factions.
But fighting terrorism is about extinguishing
the maniacs who started fires and their handiwork,
not starting a monstrous blaze in a stable
and quiet backwater.
The miserably named “war on terrorism”
has always been partly a struggle for minds-
which we’ve been losing at the speed of light.
From failing to lift a finger to control
the Palestinian Israeli conflict, to talk
of crusades, to invading Iraq based on nonexistent WMD’s, this
administration has been Bin Laden’s
best recruiting tool. International Arab
television has ensured that the graphic suffering
of the Iraqis (and Palestinians) has been
beamed to 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide.
For every terrorist we kill or capture in
Iraq, we are generating dozens or hundreds
in Pakistan or Egypt, Saudi Arabia or Indonesia,
which makes this the most counterproductive
war in our history. So, we aren’t just removing
the suicidal terrorists, we are breeding them, by fueling their obsession with persecution
by sitting astride the Vatican of the Shia
faith.. and the heart of the Arab world.
They don’t hate us because of our freedom, but because of our actions.
The courage of Iraqis in defying the
nihilistic killers by voting is
heartening, but I fear that Sunni disenfranchisement
(only 2% of assembly) will lead to a civil
war- soon. As the Shiites take control, they
are likely to react in savage fashion to
the Sunni terrorism, especially when they
go after the Shiite Mullahs and mosques.§ 83 years of being treated like animals
will resurface. And no matter how much we
mouth the word freedom, how free can people be when they can’t walk
out the door, and most are nostalgic for
Saddam’s safety. It’s almost heartbreaking to hear our troops
simplistically celebrate the election, but
by their sacrifice, help install the Shiite Mullahs that have been the bane of our existence
in Iran. Muqtada Al Sadr didn’t stop the
violence because he saw the light, but because
democracy was soon going to hand him the
keys to the kingdom.
Now Bush wants to deal with the long smoldering
flames in Iran, a clear and present danger
risen to white hot with their real massive nuclear program- what we should have confronted rather than Iraq. But the squandering of
our wealth, resources, integrity, and good
will in Iraq; will make that difficult or
impossible.
* Ansar al-Islam was a fanatical group
on the Iran border loosely allied with Al
Qaida and formed after 9-11, but they were
warring against the Kurds, who had great
incentives to exaggerate connections and
support by Saddam and Osama; Eradicated in
beginning of war. Saddam also supported terrorism
in Israel by paying bounties to suicide bombers’
families
Michael Hammerschlag's commentary and articles (http://HAMMERNEWS.com) have appeared in Seattle Times, Providence. Journal, Columbia
Journalism Review, Honolulu Advertiser, Capital Times, MediaChannel; and Moscow News, Tribune, Times, and
Guardian. He's been a TV reporter, foreign correspondent,
and produced documentaries over 25 years.
He spent 2 years in Russia as the empire
collapsed, reported on Dean’s savaging by
the media, and had the first big scoop on
all the media mistakes on Election Night
2000 hammerschlag@bigfoot.com
--Baghdad: from riverbend Feb 18, 95